Comparison tables for evaluating FAIR Digital Object and Linked Data

⬇️🏷️ Download all the metadata for Comparison tables for evaluating FAIR Digital Object and Linked Data in JSON-LD format

Comparison tables for evaluating FAIR Digital Object and Linked Data

@id ./
name [?] Comparison tables for evaluating FAIR Digital Object and Linked Data
@type Dataset
description [?] RO-Crate and tables from the paper "Evaluating FAIR Digital Object and Linked Data as distributed object systems". We systematically evaluate FDO and its implementations as a global distributed object system, by using five different conceptual frameworks that cover interoperability, middleware, FAIR principles, EOSC requirements and FDO guidelines themself.
datePublished [?] 2023-06-26
identifier [?] undefined: doi:10.5281/zenodo.8075229
cite-as [?] https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8075229
url [?] https://w3id.org/ro/doi/10.5281/zenodo.8075229
distribution [?] https://zenodo.org/record/8075230/files/evaluating-fdo-and-ld-crate.zip
license [?] CC-BY-4.0
hasPart [?]
Items that reference this one
about [?] ro-crate-metadata.json


Go to: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8075229



Go to: https://zenodo.org/record/8075230/files/evaluating-fdo-and-ld-crate.zip

@id https://zenodo.org/record/8075230/files/evaluating-fdo-and-ld-crate.zip
@type DataDownload
encodingFormat [?]
contentSize [?] 174349
Items that reference this one
distribution [?] Comparison tables for evaluating FAIR Digital Object and Linked Data


Go to: CC-BY-4.0

@id http://spdx.org/licenses/CC-BY-4.0
name [?] CC-BY-4.0
@type CreativeWork
description [?] Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
version [?] 4.0
url [?] https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Items that reference this one
license [?]


Go to: Evaluating FAIR Digital Object and Linked Data as distributed object systems (PDF)

@id https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.07436
name [?] Evaluating FAIR Digital Object and Linked Data as distributed object systems (PDF)
@type ScholarlyArticle
description [?] FAIR Digital Object (FDO) is an emerging concept that is highlighted by European Open Science Cloud (EOSC) as a potential candidate for building a ecosystem of machine-actionable research outputs. In this work we systematically evaluate FDO and its implementations as a global distributed object system, by using five different conceptual frameworks that cover interoperability, middleware, FAIR principles, EOSC requirements and FDO guidelines themself. We compare the FDO approach with established Linked Data practices and the existing Web architecture, and provide a brief history of the Semantic Web while discussing why these technologies may have been difficult to adopt for FDO purposes. We conclude with recommendations for both Linked Data and FDO communities to further their adaptation and alignment.
datePublished [?] 2023-06-12
author [?]
identifier [?] https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.07436
license [?] CC-BY-4.0
version [?] 2
keywords [?] Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC), Networking and Internet Architecture (cs.NI), FOS: Computer and information sciences, FOS: Computer and information sciences, H.3; C.2
dateModified [?] 2023-06-14T00:03:40Z
publisher [?] arXiv
Items that reference this one
hasPart [?] Comparison tables for evaluating FAIR Digital Object and Linked Data
sameAs [?] Evaluating FAIR Digital Object and Linked Data as distributed object systems (HTML)


⬇️ Download: Evaluating FAIR Digital Object and Linked Data as distributed object systems (HTML)

@id main.html
name [?] Evaluating FAIR Digital Object and Linked Data as distributed object systems (HTML)
@type
  • File
  • ScholarlyArticle
  • WebPage
author [?]
encodingFormat [?]
sameAs [?] Evaluating FAIR Digital Object and Linked Data as distributed object systems (PDF)
hasPart [?]
url [?] https://s11.no/2023/phd/evaluating-fdo/
Items that reference this one
hasPart [?] Comparison tables for evaluating FAIR Digital Object and Linked Data


⬇️ Download: Table 1

@id table1.html
name [?] Table 1
@type
  • File
  • Table
description [?] Considering FDO and Web according to the quality levels of the Interoperability Framework for Fast Data (Delgado 2016).
encodingFormat [?]
cssSelector [?] #tbl:fdo-web-interoperability-framework
about [?]
citation [?] Interoperability Framework and Distributed Platform for Fast Data Applications
Items that reference this one
hasPart [?]


⬇️ Download: Table 2

@id table2.html
name [?] Table 2
@type
  • File
  • Table
description [?] Mapping the Metamodel concepts from the Interoperability Framework for Fast Data (Delgado 2016) to equivalent concepts for FDO and Web.
encodingFormat [?]
cssSelector [?] #tbl:metamodel-concepts
encodesCreativeWork [?]
citation [?] Interoperability Framework and Distributed Platform for Fast Data Applications
Items that reference this one
hasPart [?]


⬇️ Download: Table 3

@id table3.html
name [?] Table 3
@type
  • File
  • Table
description [?] Checking FDO guidelines (Boinno et al. 2019; Anders et al. 2023) against its current implementations as DOIP (DONA 2018) and Linked Data Platform (LDP) (Bonino da Silva Santos, Guizzardi, and Sales 2022), with suggestions for required additions.
encodingFormat [?]
cssSelector [?] #tbl:fdo-checks
citation [?]
Items that reference this one
hasPart [?]


⬇️ Download: Table 4

@id table4.html
name [?] Table 4
@type
  • File
  • Table
description [?] Comparing FAIR Digital Object (with the DOIP 2.0 protocol (DONA 2018)) and Web technologies (using Linked Data) as middleware infrastructures (Zarras 2004)
encodingFormat [?]
cssSelector [?] #tbl:fdo-web-middleware
Items that reference this one
hasPart [?]


⬇️ Download: Table 5

@id table5.html
name [?] Table 5
@type
  • File
  • Table
description [?] Assessing RDA’s FAIR Data Maturity Model (FAIR Data Maturity Model Working Group 2020; Bahim et al. 2020) (first 2 columns) against the FDO guidelines (Bonino et al. 2019), FDO implemented with the protocol DOIPv2 (DONA 2018), Linked Data Platform (LDP) (Bonino da Silva Santos, Guizzardi, and Sales 2022) and examples from Linked Data practices in general. (— indicates Unspecified, may be possible with additional conventions)
encodingFormat [?]
cssSelector [?] #tbl:fair-data-maturity-model
Items that reference this one
hasPart [?]


A structural metamodel of resources and of their interactions

@id #metamodel
name [?] A structural metamodel of resources and of their interactions
@type
  • DefinedTermSet
  • skos:ConceptScheme
description [?] Terms from the (Delgado 2016) metamodel expressed hierarchically as a SKOS concept scheme. For definitions, see (Delgado 2018) which unfortunately is not Open Access
author [?] José Carlos Martins Delgado
dct:title A structural metamodel of resources and of their interactions
image [?] Figure 1.5 in (Delgado 2018)
dct:creator
creator [?] Stian Soiland-Reyes
isBasedOn [?] Interoperability Framework and Distributed Platform for Fast Data Applications
skos:hasTopConcept Resource
hasDefinedTerm [?]
Items that reference this one
hasPart [?] Comparison tables for evaluating FAIR Digital Object and Linked Data
encodesCreativeWork [?] Table 2
skos:inScheme


A partial list of FDO terms (for Table 2)



A partial list of Web terms (for Table 2)



FDO Forum FDO Requirement Specifications Version 2.1 (RO-Crate)

@id PR-RequirementSpec-2.1/
name [?] FDO Forum FDO Requirement Specifications Version 2.1 (RO-Crate)
@type Dataset
subjectOf [?]
Items that reference this one
hasPart [?] Comparison tables for evaluating FAIR Digital Object and Linked Data


FDO Forum FDO Requirement Specifications Version 3.0 (RO-Crate)

@id PR-RequirementSpec-3.0/
name [?] FDO Forum FDO Requirement Specifications Version 3.0 (RO-Crate)
@type Dataset
subjectOf [?]
Items that reference this one
hasPart [?] Comparison tables for evaluating FAIR Digital Object and Linked Data